IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0320222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Well-being inequities in eleven rural Georgia communities: A latent profile analysis

Author

Listed:
  • April K Hermstad
  • Regine Haardörfer
  • Kimberly Jacob Arriola
  • Peter Stoepker
  • Emily L Leung
  • Michelle C Kegler

Abstract

Personal well-being is a broad term that encompasses life domains that are not strictly health related, including social, emotional, financial, and environmental factors. Well-being is highly correlated with a range of sociodemographics and health outcomes. Little is known about well-being in rural communities, although the literature suggests that rural communities may be structurally and demographically disadvantaged regarding well-being. This cross-sectional study examined sociodemographic and health-related differences in key well-being domains, using the Personal Well-being Index (PWI). Latent Profile Analysis was used to identify demographic traits and health-related factors associated with differing levels of well-being. As part of a cross-site evaluation of a rural health initiative, we conducted a random, population-based mail survey in 11 rural counties in Georgia (USA). Between December 2018 and June 2019, surveys were mailed to 10,621 households, with 2,788 individuals completing the survey (26.2% response rate). We observed consistent differences in PWI scores and for each domain comprising the PWI across all sociodemographic categories, with characteristics that have historically conferred advantages in the USA (e.g., male gender, White race) generally being associated with greater well-being. The Latent Profile Analysis revealed five distinct well-being profiles reflecting different levels of well-being, with most respondents falling into the Very High or High well-being profile groups. Despite structural and demographic disadvantages, well-being and its sociodemographic and health-related correlates in this rural sample were comparable to that of urban settings. Coalitions working in partnership with researchers and evaluators may be an effective mechanism for identifying the factors that influence well-being and health. Interventions on social determinants of health may help determine what approaches are successful and best promote well-being, in addition to health, while also reducing socioeconomic inequities.

Suggested Citation

  • April K Hermstad & Regine Haardörfer & Kimberly Jacob Arriola & Peter Stoepker & Emily L Leung & Michelle C Kegler, 2025. "Well-being inequities in eleven rural Georgia communities: A latent profile analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320222
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0320222
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0320222&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0320222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.