IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0320082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plasma-lyte solution versus saline in kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author

Listed:
  • Yucai Chang
  • Yuechen Qin
  • Yue Zou
  • Haijian Zeng
  • Chunlan Li
  • Mengtian Qin
  • Jianyu Wu
  • Jian Ban

Abstract

Introduction: The optimal intravenous fluid for kidney transplantation (KT) is still controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of plasma-lyte solution (PL) versus saline (NS) in kidney transplantation. Materials and methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing plasma-lyte and saline in kidney transplantation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Meta-analyses of delayed graft function (DGF), creatinine levels, urine output, blood pH, bicarbonate, base excess, electrolytes, serum chloride, potassium and sodium immediately post-surgery were performed. Results: Totally six randomized controlled studies with 1197 patients were included. In comparison to the NS group, the PL group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of DGF (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.86, P = 0.002) and reduced serum chloride (MD: -8.87, 95% CI: -13.50 to -4.25, P = 0.0002) as well as serum sodium(MD: -1.08, 95% CI: -1.54 to -0.61, P

Suggested Citation

  • Yucai Chang & Yuechen Qin & Yue Zou & Haijian Zeng & Chunlan Li & Mengtian Qin & Jianyu Wu & Jian Ban, 2025. "Plasma-lyte solution versus saline in kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320082
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0320082
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0320082&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0320082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.