IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0320041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preventing the preventable: Assessing the burden of incessant caesarean deliveries in select Indian states using NFHS-5

Author

Listed:
  • Punit Mishra
  • Retna Sheeja Pushpa Raj
  • Aditi Aditi
  • Muthusamy Sivakami

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that life-saving Caesarean sections (CS) should account for 10–15% of deliveries. Southern states of India have good obstetric facilities and better public health systems than other parts of India. However, CS rates in select states are considerably higher. This study examines the prevalence and determinants of preventable CS among mothers in select Indian states, specifically the states that have high institutional deliveries (>95%) viz. Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu. It further compares the complications faced by CS and vaginal delivery cases. Data has been derived from a cross-sectional survey, the National Family Health Survey-5. Bivariate and Logistic regression analyses were used. The main outcome measured is Preventable C-sections, defined as per conditions in Robson’s criteria of 10-group classification based on obstetric characteristics for a woman. Results show that the preventable CS rates in these selected states were much higher than at the national level. Key correlates were higher education and middle socioeconomic status. The study highlights the need for policy reforms, maternal education, and healthcare system improvements to reduce unnecessary CS in select states of India, where the health system is exceptionally good but , have another health burden in form of demand for unnecessary caesarean deliveries.

Suggested Citation

  • Punit Mishra & Retna Sheeja Pushpa Raj & Aditi Aditi & Muthusamy Sivakami, 2025. "Preventing the preventable: Assessing the burden of incessant caesarean deliveries in select Indian states using NFHS-5," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320041
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0320041
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0320041&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0320041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.