Author
Listed:
- Youssef Arafat
- Cristina Cuesta-Apausa
- Esther Castellano
- Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro
Abstract
Obtaining the traces and the characteristics of elongated structures is an important task in computer vision pipelines. In biomedical applications, the analysis of traces of vasculature, nerves or fibres of the extracellular matrix can help characterise processes like angiogenesis or the effect of a certain treatment. This paper presents an objective comparison of six existing methodologies (Edge detection, CT Fire, Scale Space, Twombli, U-Net and Graph Based) and one novel approach called Trace Ridges to trace biomedical images with fibre-like structures. Trace Ridges is a fully automatic and fast algorithm that combines a series of image-processing algorithms including filtering, watershed transform and edge detection to obtain an accurate delineation of the fibre-like structures in a rapid time. To compare the algorithms, four biomedical data sets with vastly distinctive characteristics were selected. Ground truth was obtained by manual delineation of the fibre-like structures. Three pre-processing filtering options were used as a first step: no filtering, Gaussian low-pass and DnCnn, a deep-learning filtering. Three distance error metrics (total, average and maximum distance from the obtained traces to the ground truth) and processing time were calculated. It was observed that no single algorithm outperformed the others in all metrics. For the total distance error, which was considered the most significative, Trace Ridges ranked first, followed by Graph Based, U-Net, Twombli, Scale Space, CT Fire and Edge Detection. In terms of speed, Trace Ridges ranked second, only slightly slower than Edge Detection. Code is freely available at github.com/youssefarafat/Trace_Ridges.
Suggested Citation
Youssef Arafat & Cristina Cuesta-Apausa & Esther Castellano & Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro, 2025.
"Fibre tracing in biomedical images: An objective comparison between seven algorithms,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-25, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0320006
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320006
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.