IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0319943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geriatric assessment domains as predictors for clinical endpoints in older adults with cancer: Protocol for an updated systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Schroder Sattar
  • Efthymios Papadopoulos
  • Kristen R Haase
  • Cara Bradley
  • Caroline Mariano
  • Isabel Tejero
  • Rana Jin
  • Martine Puts
  • Shabbir M H Alibhai

Abstract

Geriatric assessments (GA) are increasingly used to inform treatment decision making and tailoring supportive care for older adults with cancer. Identifying which domains predict clinically relevant outcomes might be particularly useful for risk stratification in settings where a GA is not available and/or feasible. The objective of this updated systematic review is to evaluate individual GA domains as predictors for mortality and treatment-related outcomes. Eligible studies will be identified using a predefined search strategy developed in collaboration with an expert librarian in electronic databases (Medline, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL) and comprise peer-reviewed papers published in any language from July 2017 and reporting on the prospective association between individual GA domains and mortality as well as surgical- or systemic treatment-related outcomes in older adults with cancer. All title/abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction will be performed independently by at least 2 authors. Information on cut-offs of GA domains will also be extracted to assess for variability across studies. A decision on performing a meta-analysis versus a narrative summary will be made based on predetermined criteria, which will include heterogeneity among studies and variability in GA tools and cutoff used for each individual domain, as well as level of risk of bias. If a meta-analysis is indicated, a random effects meta-analysis will be conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. The review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. This protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024580404). This review seeks to investigate individual GA domains as predictors for patient- and treatment-related outcomes. Findings may inform efforts on optimizing GA for this population.

Suggested Citation

  • Schroder Sattar & Efthymios Papadopoulos & Kristen R Haase & Cara Bradley & Caroline Mariano & Isabel Tejero & Rana Jin & Martine Puts & Shabbir M H Alibhai, 2025. "Geriatric assessment domains as predictors for clinical endpoints in older adults with cancer: Protocol for an updated systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-8, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319943
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319943
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319943&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0319943?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.