IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0319870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the link between work-related psychosocial factors and professional quality of life among ethiopian healthcare workers: Insights from structural equation modelling analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Yitagesu Habtu
  • Abera Kumie
  • Medhine Selamu
  • Mirgissa Kaba
  • Hidenori Harada
  • Eshetu Girma

Abstract

Background: Work-related psychosocial factors increase the likelihood of poor professional quality of life (PQoL) outcomes, which are composed of three subscales burnout (BO), compassion fatigue(CF), and low compassion satisfaction (CS). However, studies on the impact of work-related psychosocial factors and the mediating role of workplace social support on PQoL in Ethiopian healthcare workers are limited. Therefore, our study aimed to explore the link between work-related factors and three subscales of PQoL, and assess the mediational role of workplace social support. Methods: We used a cross-sectional study design in selected public hospitals in Central and Southern Ethiopia between January and February 2023. We used a stratified random multistage sampling technique to select participants. We collected data on our endogenous variables using the PQoL-9 and data on exogenous work-related psychosocial variables using psychometrically validated scales. The data were entered using Epi-info 7 and exported to JAMOVI 2.4.14 for structural equation modelling. Results: A total of 1426 healthcare workers participated in the study. Among health workers, 25.5% experienced burnout above the third quartile, 24.8% had compassion fatigue above the third quartile, and nearly half scored below the third quartile for compassion satisfaction. Healthcare workers’ exposure to higher job demands (β=0.186) and work-family conflict (β = 0.306) were positively associated with BO, while decision latitude (β = -0.133), social support (β = -0.178), and job rewards (β = -0.170) were negatively associated. Decision latitude (β = -0.186), job rewards (β = -0.227), and social support (β = -0.152) are negatively associated, and work-family conflict (β = 0.367), and job effort (β = 0.067) positively associated with CF. Regarding CS, social support (β = 0.305), decision latitude (β = 0.262), and job rewards (β = 0.068) were positively associated, while work-family conflict (β = -0.199) was negatively associated. Conclusion: Our study highlighted the importance of promoting workplace interventions among healthcare workers to reduce BO, and CF, and increase CS. Various job rewarding strategies including revising current salary evaluation and grading systems, incentive packages, and recognition systems are required to improve health workers’ PQoL. Interventions focusing on work-family balance, workload management skills, technical job decision latitude skills and task force allocation may be required to optimize job demands and controls.

Suggested Citation

  • Yitagesu Habtu & Abera Kumie & Medhine Selamu & Mirgissa Kaba & Hidenori Harada & Eshetu Girma, 2025. "Exploring the link between work-related psychosocial factors and professional quality of life among ethiopian healthcare workers: Insights from structural equation modelling analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-30, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319870
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319870
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319870&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0319870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.