Author
Listed:
- Guillermo Ruiz-Pérez
- Madeleine Küsel
- Sebastian von Peter
Abstract
Background: The integration of Peer Support Workers (PSWs) in mental health settings may encounter resistance due to the attitudes of Mental Health Workers (MHWs). At the same time, PSWs may initiate changes in the attitudes, as well as in the larger institutional culture. This paper addresses the question of which changes happen and how they occur. Methods: This work is part of the ImpPeer-Psy5 study, funded by the German Innovation Fund, which examines the nationwide implementation of PSWs in health insurance-funded mental health care. Data were derived from two qualitative sub-studies: QUAL1encompassed 57 problem-centered interviews conducted with PSWs, MHWs working together with PSWs, and service users; QUAL2 consisted of one focus group and five interviews only with MHWs. Qualitative data were analyzed using a modified thematic analysis adapted to a collaborative research approach. Results: The main findings included that working with PSWs makes MHWs better integrate lived experience insights into their caregiving, pay more attention to life contexts, advance towards a more appreciative language, use diagnostic categories more flexibly, and show more openness towards their own affectedness. These changes are reported to be mediated by the simple presence of PSWs, their “role model” function for other staff, or more direct forms of feedback and critique. Conclusion: Overall, staff attitudes changed as a result of reflexive processes induced by their interactions with PSWs. This poses a dilemma as changes in MHWs and larger institutions are expected to occur prior to the implementation of peer support work to facilitate their integration. Further research is needed to evaluate whether and how staff training can facilitate the implementation of PSWs by targeting MHWs’ attitudes.
Suggested Citation
Guillermo Ruiz-Pérez & Madeleine Küsel & Sebastian von Peter, 2025.
"Changes in attitudes of mental health care staff surrounding the implementation of peer support work: A qualitative study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-18, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0319830
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319830
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.