IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0319734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of the impact of administrative approval reform on the technological complexity of manufacturing exports

Author

Listed:
  • Tingting Jiang
  • Zhibin Zhang

Abstract

As the global economic landscape evolves, the low technological content and persistent lack of international competitiveness in China’s manufacturing exports have become increasingly apparent, underscoring the urgent need for a transition from “quantity” to “quality” in the sector. Administrative approval reform, a key pillar of institutional innovation in the new era, plays a critical role in enhancing the technological complexity of manufacturing exports and strengthening international competitiveness. Using data from 2001 to 2013, this study investigates the impact of administrative approval reform on the technological complexity of manufacturing exports and explores its underlying mechanisms from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. Theoretical model analysis suggests that administrative approval reform effectively increases technological complexity by reducing the marginal and fixed costs associated with adjusting product complexity. Empirical findings provide robust evidence that administrative approval reform significantly enhances technological complexity, with results holding across various sensitivity tests. At the micro level, the reduction of institutional transaction costs emerges as a key channel through which the reform exerts its impact. Additionally, increasing investment in research and development, fixed assets, and technological innovation are identified as critical pathways influencing technological complexity. The reform’s effects are particularly pronounced for non-state-owned enterprises and firms located in coastal and port cities, as revealed by a heterogeneity analysis. Furthermore, a decomposition of city-level export technological complexity using the DOP method shows that improved inter-firm resource allocation—by shifting market share from firms with lower technological complexity to those with higher technological complexity—serves as the primary mechanism driving the observed improvements at the city level. This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence on the role of administrative approval reform in fostering the technological upgrading of manufacturing exports, highlighting its differentiated impact across firm types and regions. The findings offer valuable insights for policymakers seeking to enhance the technological complexity and international competitiveness of manufacturing exports in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Tingting Jiang & Zhibin Zhang, 2025. "An analysis of the impact of administrative approval reform on the technological complexity of manufacturing exports," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-29, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319734
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319734
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319734&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0319734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.