IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0319714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety and efficacy of programmed cell death-1 inhibitors in relapsed immune-privileged site lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ekdanai Uawithya
  • Kamolchanok Kulchutisin
  • Jiraporn Jitprapaikulsan
  • Nattawut Leelakanok
  • Weerapat Owattanapanich

Abstract

Background: Large B-cell lymphoma of immune-privileged sites (LBCL-IP) is a rare subtype characterized by immune evasion properties. Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and primary testicular lymphoma (PTL) are examples of LBCL-IP associated with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). Few studies have investigated the use of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with relapsed PCNSL and PTL. Objective: To conduct a systematic review evaluating the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with relapsed PCNSL and PTL. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for relevant studies. The inclusion criteria focused on adult patients diagnosed with relapsed PCNSL or PTL who were treated with PD-1 inhibitors. We excluded case reports or series with fewer than five participants, review articles, and animal studies. A random-effects model with the DerSimonian‒Laird method analyzed the pooled complete response rate (CRR), partial response rate (PRR), overall response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Results: Seven studies comprising 127 patients (124 with relapsed PCNSL and 3 with PTL) were included. All patients were treated with either nivolumab or pembrolizumab. The pooled CRR was 42.8% (95% CI, 25.7%‒60.0%; I2 = 75.25%; p

Suggested Citation

  • Ekdanai Uawithya & Kamolchanok Kulchutisin & Jiraporn Jitprapaikulsan & Nattawut Leelakanok & Weerapat Owattanapanich, 2025. "Safety and efficacy of programmed cell death-1 inhibitors in relapsed immune-privileged site lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319714
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319714
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319714&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0319714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.