Author
Listed:
- Thales Guardia de Barros
- Emerson Roberto dos Santos
- João Daniel de Souza Menezes
- Matheus Querino da Silva
- Marco Antonio Ribeiro Filho
- Fabio Argollo Ferreira
- Lucas Antonio Moura Gonzalez
- Aparecida Custódio Da Silva
- Izabelle Pereira Trindade
- Luana Mari Takahashi
- Natalia Almeida de Arnaldo Silva Rodrigues Castro
- Loiane Letícia dos Santos
- Camila Borge de Freitas
- Natália Aparecida de Oliveira
- William Donegá Martinez
- Alex Bertolazzo Quitério
- Ana Julia de Deus Silva
- Luiz Otávio Maciel Lopes
- Sônia Maria Maciel Lopes
- Camila Aline Lázaro
- Maria Laura Fabris
- Maysa Alahmar Bianchin
- Gerardo Maria de Araújo Filho
- Denise Cristina Móz
- Vaz Oliani
- Antônio Hélio Oliani
- Neuza Alves Bonifácio
- Aparecida de Fátima Michelin
- Vânia Maria Sabadoto Brienze
- Júlio César André
- Patrícia da Silva Fucuta
Abstract
Background: Interprofessional Education (IPE) is widely recognized as essential for fostering collaborative healthcare practices and improving patient outcomes. Despite its acknowledged importance, there remains a notable scarcity of longitudinal research assessing medical students’ readiness for IPE across distinct educational stages, particularly within diverse global contexts like Brazil. Aim: This study sought to address this gap by longitudinally mapping and analyzing the evolution of medical students’ readiness for interprofessional learning throughout their academic training at a Brazilian university. Methods: Employing a quantitative longitudinal design, 53 medical students from the 2021 cohort completed the validated Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) at three critical time points: upon university entry (2021), at the conclusion of the basic science cycle (2022), and at the end of the clinical cycle (2024). Temporal changes were assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: Significant global differences were observed over time in the “Teamwork and collaboration” and “Patient-centered care” dimensions. Specifically, “Patient-centered care” exhibited a non-linear pattern, characterized by an initial increase followed by a subsequent decrease. In contrast, the “Professional identity” dimension demonstrated remarkable stability across all measurement points. Conclusions: These findings reveal the complex and dynamic nature of interprofessional readiness development during medical education. They strongly advocate for the early introduction of IPE, coupled with sustained and adaptive interventions throughout the entire educational continuum, particularly to address fluctuations in patient-centered attitudes and to foster an interprofessional identity from the outset. This study offers crucial empirical insights for optimizing IPE strategies and preparing future physicians for collaborative practice.
Suggested Citation
Thales Guardia de Barros & Emerson Roberto dos Santos & João Daniel de Souza Menezes & Matheus Querino da Silva & Marco Antonio Ribeiro Filho & Fabio Argollo Ferreira & Lucas Antonio Moura Gonzalez & , 2025.
"Interprofessional education: A recognized necessity, a persistent challenge - Perspectives from a longitudinal study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-20, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0319633
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319633
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.