IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0319348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing an automated sleep detection algorithm using wrist-worn accelerometer data for individuals with chronic pain

Author

Listed:
  • Louis Faust
  • Emma Fortune
  • Omid Jahanian
  • Sey Oloyede
  • Clifford Trouard
  • Suzanne Dixon
  • Erica Torres
  • Chris Sletten
  • Paul Scholten

Abstract

Objective: To optimize a wrist-worn accelerometer-based, automated sleep detection methodology for chronic pain populations. Patients and methods: A cohort of 16 patients with chronic pain underwent free-living observation for one week before participating in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Program. Patients wore ActiGraph GT9X devices and maintained a sleep diary, documenting their nightly bedtimes and wake times. To derive sleep quality measures from accelerometry data, the Tudor-Locke sleep detection algorithm was employed. However, this algorithm had not been validated for chronic pain patients. Therefore, a sensitivity analysis of the algorithm’s parameters was conducted, identifying a set of parameters which maximized the agreement between sleep periods identified by the algorithm and sleep periods identified by participant’s sleep logs, which were considered ground truth. Sleep measures derived when using the optimized parameters were then compared against sleep measures derived using the default parameters. Results: Our optimized parameter set achieved a mean sleep detection agreement of 67% with participant’s sleep logs, while the default parameter set achieved a mean agreement of 50%. Statistically significant differences were observed between sleep measures from the optimal and default parameter sets (P

Suggested Citation

  • Louis Faust & Emma Fortune & Omid Jahanian & Sey Oloyede & Clifford Trouard & Suzanne Dixon & Erica Torres & Chris Sletten & Paul Scholten, 2025. "Optimizing an automated sleep detection algorithm using wrist-worn accelerometer data for individuals with chronic pain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319348
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319348
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319348&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0319348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.