IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0319171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monocytic TLR4 expression and activation in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Melika Jameie
  • Sanaz Bordbar
  • Reza Samiee
  • Mobina Amanollahi
  • Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha
  • Mir Sajjad Aleyasin
  • Mohammad Reza Abdol Homayuni
  • Mehrdad Mozafar
  • Seyed Behnamedin Jameie
  • Shahin Akhondzadeh

Abstract

Background: The role of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in schizophrenia remains unclear, with studies reporting conflicting results on its expression and activation in persons with schizophrenia (PwSCZ). This systematic review/meta-analysis compared basal monocytic TLR4 expression, as well as its activation pattern between PwSCZ and healthy controls (HCs). Methods: This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021273858) and adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was conducted through MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to December 12, 2023. Quantitative syntheses were conducted for (a) basal monocytic TLR4 density, (b) basal percentage of TLR4+ monocytes, and (c) basal TLR4 gene expression. Effect sizes were computed using Hedges’ g for mean differences. Random-effect models with restricted maximum-likelihood estimation were used, and subgrouping was conducted based on antipsychotic status. The studies’ risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool. Results: Eleven studies (473 PwSCZ, 416 HCs) were included. Pooled analysis revealed a nonsignificant trend toward increased basal monocytic TLR4 density in PwSCZ (Hedges’ g = 0.317 [95% CI: –0.060, 0.694], τ2 = 0.127, I2 = 68.91%). The difference became significant after sensitivity analysis and excluding one study (Hedges’ g = 0.469 [0.195,0.742], p = 0.001). No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of TLR4+ monocytes percentage (Hedges’ g = 0.235 [–0.245, 0.715], τ2 = 0.31, I2 = 87.30%) or TLR4 gene expression (Hedges’ g = 0.179 [–0.502, 0.861], τ2 = 0.29, I2 = 79.04%). According to qualitative synthesis, TLR4 stimulation resulted in reduced monocytic activation in PwSCZ compared to HCs. Conclusions: This study suggested a trend toward an increased basal monocytic TLR4 density in PwSCZ, with no difference in the basal percentage of TLR4+ monocytes or TLR4 gene expression. However, the limited available data underscores the need for future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Melika Jameie & Sanaz Bordbar & Reza Samiee & Mobina Amanollahi & Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha & Mir Sajjad Aleyasin & Mohammad Reza Abdol Homayuni & Mehrdad Mozafar & Seyed Behnamedin Jameie & Shahin Akh, 2025. "Monocytic TLR4 expression and activation in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319171
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319171
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319171&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0319171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.