IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0319144.html

Differences between Scaly-sided Merganser (Mergus squamatus) and Common Merganser (M. merganser) feather microstructure

Author

Listed:
  • Donghong Li
  • Shiyu Zhang
  • Ran Tian
  • Yongbin Zhao
  • Guodong Yi

Abstract

The microstructural characteristics of feathers are useful for species identification. In this study, scanning electron microscopy was employed to examine the microstructures of contour feathers, rectrices, and down feathers from both the Scaly-sided Merganser (Mergus squamatus) and Common Merganser (Mergus merganser). The primary objective was to assess inter-species differences and evaluate the potential of these microstructural characteristics as reliable indicators for distinguishing species. Several microstructural characteristics of feathers exhibited significant variations between the two species. In rectrices, significant variations were observed in the prong length, base length, hooklet number, and prong number of distal barbules. Similarly, down feathers exhibited marked differences in the node number, distance between nodes, internode width, and barbule length of downy barbules. Stepwise discriminant analysis, combined with the leave-one-out cross-validation test, further validated the discriminatory power of all microstructural characteristics. For contour feathers, incorporating the base length into the model achieved a 56.9% correct classification rate. In rectrices, the hooklet number and prong length emerged as key discriminators, with a correct classification rate of 91.3%. Most notably, the barbule length, node number, and distance between nodes of down feathers demonstrated exceptional discriminative capabilities, attaining a perfect 100% correct classification rate. Consequently, the barbule length, node number, and distance between nodes of down feathers, may serve as potentially useful morphological markers for differentiating the Scaly-sided Merganser from the Common Merganser.

Suggested Citation

  • Donghong Li & Shiyu Zhang & Ran Tian & Yongbin Zhao & Guodong Yi, 2026. "Differences between Scaly-sided Merganser (Mergus squamatus) and Common Merganser (M. merganser) feather microstructure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319144
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319144
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319144&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0319144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.