IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0318937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guideline-based bismuth quadruple therapy for helicobacter pylori infection in China: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jiali Wei
  • Zehao Zheng
  • Xin Wang
  • Boyi Jia
  • Mingyao Sun
  • Jiayi Wang
  • Qin Wan
  • Mei Han
  • Yue Qiu

Abstract

Background: Currently, quadruple therapy is unanimously recommended as the current first-line treatment option for Helicobacter pylori (H. Pylori) eradication. However, the drug composition of quadruple therapy is very complex, and the efficacy and safety between them is not clear. Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of H. Pylori eradication regimens, which were recommended by the Fifth Consensus of China, by network meta-analysis. Methods: Literature databases were used to retrieve clinical randomized controlled trials of H. Pylori eradication. Network meta-analysis was performed using BUGSnet and meta package of R software, using OR values as effect size, and SUCRA was used to rank the efficacy of interventions under each outcome. Results: A total of 55 studies and 130 arms were included. The NMA analysis found that the top regimen in term of eradication rate outcome was: Rabeprazole + Bismuth + Furazolidone + Tetracycline (SUCRA, 97.5). In terms of safety outcomes: Lansoprazole + Bismuth + Amoxycillin + Clarithromycin (SUCRA, 91.97). Conclusions: The bismuth quadruple therapies recommended by the guidelines for the treatment of H. Pylori have good performance in terms of four-week eradication rate and safety outcome indicators, and due to the different resistance of antibiotics in different regional populations, rational use of drugs should be combined with local conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiali Wei & Zehao Zheng & Xin Wang & Boyi Jia & Mingyao Sun & Jiayi Wang & Qin Wan & Mei Han & Yue Qiu, 2025. "Guideline-based bismuth quadruple therapy for helicobacter pylori infection in China: A systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318937
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318937
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318937&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0318937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.