Author
Listed:
- Brendan Hoffe
- Gia Kang
- Hannah Thomson
- Rohan Banton
- Thuvan Piehler
- Oren E Petel
- Matthew R Holahan
Abstract
Brain tissue as a material presents unique properties with a multitude of cell types and densities, varying degrees of axonal fiber diameters and blood vessels. These neural components are contained within a very viscous environment that upon impact, can result in a variety of tensile, compressive and rotational forces. The depths of the sulcus appear to be particularly vulnerable to biomechanical forces following an impact. The movement and subsequent forces loaded on to the brain have been shown to produce a variety of biomechanical responses that impair neurophysiological functioning at the cellular level. We recently reported a decrease in microtubule associated protein 2 (MAP2) within the depths of the porcine sulcus in an ex vivo model, along with elevated tensile strain in this region within 1 hour after impact. In the current work, using the same impact model, we explored whether changes in spine morphology and density occurred within the same timeframe following impact. The Golgi-Cox method was used to visualize dendritic spine morphology. Cortical pyramidal neurons within the depths and the arms of the sulcus were reconstructed. One hour after impact, there was a change in the distribution of spine type resulting in an increased proportion of mushroom-type spines compared to nonimpacted tissue. The increased proportion of mushroom-type spines was proportional to tensile strain measurements in the apical dendrites. These results demonstrate the sensitivity of dendritic spine morphology to tensile strain within the porcine cortex and suggest a state of hyperexcitability during the hyperacute phase following an impact.
Suggested Citation
Brendan Hoffe & Gia Kang & Hannah Thomson & Rohan Banton & Thuvan Piehler & Oren E Petel & Matthew R Holahan, 2025.
"The link between impact-induced tensile strain and dendritic spine morphology in porcine brain tissue,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0318932
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318932
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.