IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0318914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of the hour-1 bundle on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Shukun Hong
  • Hongye Wang
  • Xiaoguang Fan
  • Jian Liu
  • Lujun Qiao

Abstract

Background: According to the 2018 bundle guidelines of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, many emergency departments and intensive care units currently adopt the hour-1 bundle as a standard practice for sepsis management. However, recent studies on the hour-1 bundle for sepsis treatment have yielded inconsistent results, raising questions and challenges about its clinical efficacy. Aim: This study will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the impact of the hour-1 bundle and non-hour-1 bundle on the clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Methods: The protocol was prepared according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses protocol (PRISMA-P) statement. The systematic review will be carried out in line with the statement of PRISMA. The following electronic databases will be searched: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. All clinical studies comparing the impact of the hour-1 bundle and non-hour-1 bundle on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and septic shock will be included. All stages of the literature search, study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Any disagreements between the two reviewers will be resolved by discussion or arbitration by a third reviewer. The primary outcome will be short-term mortality, which involves in-hospital, 28-day, 30-day, and 90-day mortality corresponding to the definition used in each study. For quality assessment, the risk of bias specified by the Cochrane Collaboration and the methodological index for non-randomized studies will be used for randomized control trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs, respectively. Data synthesis will be performed via Review Manager 5.1.0. Expected results: This systematic review will integrate all relevant studies to quantitatively estimate the effect size and clarify the role of the hour-1 bundle in sepsis management, contributing new evidence-based guidance to the field. Systematic review registration: Protocol registration and reporting: PROSPERO CRD42024579314.

Suggested Citation

  • Shukun Hong & Hongye Wang & Xiaoguang Fan & Jian Liu & Lujun Qiao, 2025. "Effect of the hour-1 bundle on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-10, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318914
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318914
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318914&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0318914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.