IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0318853.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The probability of reducing hospitalization rates for bronchiolitis with epinephrine and dexamethasone: A Bayesian analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Larry Dong
  • Terry P Klassen
  • David W Johnson
  • Rhonda Correll
  • Serge Gouin
  • Maala Bhatt
  • Hema Patel
  • Gary Joubert
  • Karen J L Black
  • Troy W S Turner
  • Sandra R Whitehouse
  • Amy C Plint
  • Anna Heath

Abstract

Background: Bronchiolitis exerts a high burden on children, their families and the healthcare system. The Canadian Bronchiolitis Epinephrine Steroid Trial (CanBEST) assessed whether administering epinephrine alone, dexamethasone alone, or in combination (EpiDex) could reduce bronchiolitis-related hospitalizations among children less than 12 months of age compared to placebo. CanBEST demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in 7-day hospitalization risk with EpiDex in an unadjusted analysis but not after adjustment. Objective: To explore the probability that EpiDex results in a reduction in hospitalizations using Bayesian methods. Study design: Using prior distributions that represent varying levels of preexisting enthusiasm or skepticism, i.e., how confident or doubtful one is that EpiDex may reduce hospitalizations, and information about the treatment effect before data were collected, the posterior distribution of the relative risk of hospitalization compared to placebo was determined. The probability that the treatment effect is less than 1, 0.9, 0.8 and 0.6, indicating increasing reductions in hospitalization risk, are computed alongside 95% credible intervals. Results: Combining a minimally informative prior distribution with the data from CanBEST provides comparable results to the original analysis. Unless strongly skeptical views about the effectiveness of EpiDex were considered, the 95% credible interval for the treatment effect lies below 1, indicating a reduction in hospitalizations. There is a 90% probability that EpiDex results in a clinically meaningful reduction in hospitalization of 10% even when incorporating skeptical views, with a 67% probability when considering strongly skeptical views. Conclusion: A Bayesian analysis demonstrates a high chance that EpiDex reduces hospitalization rates for bronchiolitis, although strongly skeptical individuals may require additional evidence to change practice. Trial registration: Clinical Trial registry name, registration number: Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN56745572

Suggested Citation

  • Larry Dong & Terry P Klassen & David W Johnson & Rhonda Correll & Serge Gouin & Maala Bhatt & Hema Patel & Gary Joubert & Karen J L Black & Troy W S Turner & Sandra R Whitehouse & Amy C Plint & Anna H, 2025. "The probability of reducing hospitalization rates for bronchiolitis with epinephrine and dexamethasone: A Bayesian analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318853
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318853
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318853&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0318853?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.