Author
Listed:
- Christin Geißler
- Monika Orsolic
- Leon Guchlerner
- Marc Diensthuber
- Timo Stöver
Abstract
Cultivating three-dimensional spiral ganglion explants is a well-established in-vitro assay for assessing the neurotrophic potential of compounds. The manual neurite measurement remains common but hinders high-throughput experimentation. The present study aimed to automate this process, comparing two methods, Sholl and Gray Value analysis, with manual neurite measurement to enhance this time-consuming and labor-intensive evaluation. The explants were cultured with brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and both neurons and neurites were marked immunohistochemically. The comparison of methods included significance of treatment group differences, accuracy, precision, time and interference. Sholl analysis outperformed manual measurements in time and precision, exhibiting fewer interferences compared to Gray Value analysis. It effectively distinguished between control and BDNF concentrations, paralleling manual tracing outcomes. The Sholl intersections per radius analysis, employing repeated measures (rm) ANOVA across 31 measurement points, exhibited the smallest deviation from manual measurement. Gray Value analysis introduced inner explant brightness as a parameter that parallels neuronal survival within the explant. The present study demonstrates, that Sholl analysis with rm ANOVA emerged as the most efficient, with reduced time and manpower requirements. This positions the improved Sholl analysis as a potent tool for high-throughput, automated assessments of neurotrophic potential, marking a significant advancement in the field.
Suggested Citation
Christin Geißler & Monika Orsolic & Leon Guchlerner & Marc Diensthuber & Timo Stöver, 2025.
"Technical report: Efficient and accurate assessment of neurite outgrowth in spiral ganglion explants using Sholl analysis and repeated measurement ANOVA,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-13, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0318613
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318613
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.