IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0318612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating patient experience in maternity services using a Bayesian belief network model

Author

Listed:
  • Abrar Abdulhakim Ahmed Munassar
  • Mecit Can Emre Simsekler
  • Ahmed Alaaeldin Saad
  • Abroon Qazi
  • Mohammed A Omar

Abstract

Pregnancy and childbirth are commonly seen as positive experiences, but they can also pose distinct challenges and risks, especially when care is insufficient. This study investigates the factors influencing maternity patient experience by exploring the complex interactions among these factors. Using data from the 2021 maternity patient survey by the National Health Services (NHS) in England, we implemented a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) to model these interactions. Three structural learning models were created, namely Bayesian Search (BS), Peter-Clark (PC), and Greedy Thick Thinning (GTT). Further, sensitivity analysis was conducted to quantify interactions among the influencing factors and identify the most influential factor affecting the outcome. The results underscore the importance of recognizing the interdependencies among the eight key domains of the survey, which collectively shape maternity care experiences. These factors include the start of care in pregnancy, antenatal check-ups, care during pregnancy, labour and birth, staff caring, care in the hospital, feeding the baby, and care after birth. These findings can guide healthcare managers and decision-makers in developing proactive strategies to mitigate factors impacting maternity patient experiences. Ultimately, this study contributes to the ongoing efforts to enhance the quality of maternity care and improve outcomes for mothers and their infants.

Suggested Citation

  • Abrar Abdulhakim Ahmed Munassar & Mecit Can Emre Simsekler & Ahmed Alaaeldin Saad & Abroon Qazi & Mohammed A Omar, 2025. "Evaluating patient experience in maternity services using a Bayesian belief network model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318612
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318612
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318612&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0318612?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.