IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0318572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of protein expression between oesophageal adenocarcinoma and normal adjacent tissue

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Nicholas
  • Alistair Bailey
  • Katy J McCann
  • Robert C Walker
  • Peter Johnson
  • Tim Elliott
  • Tim J Underwood
  • Paul Skipp

Abstract

Oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) is the 7th most common cancer in the United Kingdom (UK) and remains a significant health challenge. This study presents a proteomic analysis of seven OAC donors complementing our previous neoantigen identification study of their human leukocyte antigen (HLA) immunopeptidomes. Our small UK cohort were selected from donors undergoing treatment for OAC. We used label-free mass spectrometry proteomics to compare OAC tumour tissue to matched normal adjacent tissue (NAT) to quantify expression of 3552 proteins. We identified differential expression of a number of proteins previously linked to OAC and other cancers including common markers of tumourigenesis and immunohistological markers, as well as enrichment of processes and pathways relating to RNA processing and the immune system. Our findings also offer insight into the role of the protein stability in the generation of an OAC neoantigen we previously identified. These results provide independent corroboration of existing oesophageal adenocarcinoma biomarker studies that may inform future diagnostic and therapeutic research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Nicholas & Alistair Bailey & Katy J McCann & Robert C Walker & Peter Johnson & Tim Elliott & Tim J Underwood & Paul Skipp, 2025. "Comparative analysis of protein expression between oesophageal adenocarcinoma and normal adjacent tissue," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318572
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318572
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318572&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0318572?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.