IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0318480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting IVF live -birth probability using time-lapse data: Implications of including or excluding age in a day 2 embryo transfer model

Author

Listed:
  • Shabana Sayed
  • Bjørn Molt Petersen
  • Marte Myhre Reigstad
  • Arne Schwennicke
  • Jon Wegner Hausken
  • Ritsa Storeng

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to develop predictive models for the likelihood of live births following In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) treatment, based on a retrospective analysis of time-lapse data from Day 2 embryo transfers at Klinikk Hausken, Norway. This analysis encompassed 1,506 IVF treatment cycles, which included 865 single and 641 double embryo transfer cycles, totalling 2,147 embryos transferred.The model covariates included nucleation error, timing of two-cell stage (t2) and duration between t2 and the three-cell stage (t3). The predictive ability was assessed using Area Under Curve (AUC). Generalised Additive Mixed Models (GAMM) were utilised to address clustering effects from Single Embryo Transfers (SET) and Double Embryo Transfers (DETs), as well as the non-linear effects of female age and t2 timings. A stratification of age and model scores demonstrated the impact of incorporating age into the model. The” Base Model, not incorporating age, achieved an AUC of 0.641, while the “Age Model”, using maternal age, significantly enhanced AUC to 0.745, as estimated through bootstrap analysis.However, when the Age Model was subjected to average ages across three respective age intervals, the AUC values were comparable to the Base Model, rather than the original Age Model scores.Adjusting the Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) timing by ± 2 hours, purely as a theoretical exercise, has minimal impacts on model predictions. This highlights the value of including t2 despite fertilisation timing variations between ICSI and IVF.The Age Model did not show superiority in predicting live birth within single treatment cohorts. However, given its distinct AUC values for broader age ranges, the Age Model can serve as a counselling tool on live-birth probabilities. With further validation, we suggest only using the Age Model for general counselling, while the Base Model is preferable for the embryo selection decision support.

Suggested Citation

  • Shabana Sayed & Bjørn Molt Petersen & Marte Myhre Reigstad & Arne Schwennicke & Jon Wegner Hausken & Ritsa Storeng, 2025. "Predicting IVF live -birth probability using time-lapse data: Implications of including or excluding age in a day 2 embryo transfer model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318480
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318480
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318480&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0318480?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.