IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0318445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a multidimensional prediction model for long-term prognostic risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective observational cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Bojian Wang
  • Yanwei Du
  • Pengyu Cao
  • Min Liu
  • Jinting Yang
  • Ningning Zhang
  • Wangshu Shao
  • Lijing Zhao
  • Rongyu Li
  • Lin Wang

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to examine the critical variables that impact the long-term prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to create a multidimensional predictive risk assessment model that can serve as a theoretical basis for accurate cardiac rehabilitation. Methods: The study involved ACS patients who received PCI at the First Hospital of Jilin University from June 2020 to March 2021. Participants were categorized into two groups: acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and unstable angina (UA), according to clinical data and angiographic findings. Hospitalization data, physical performance, exercise tolerance prior to discharge, average daily steps, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and a follow-up period of 36 months were documented. The dates for accessing data for research purposes are February 10, 2022 (10/2/2022) to December 10, 2023 (10/12/2023). Results: We observed substantial increases in weight, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil granulocyte count, monocyte count, hemoglobin (Hb) levels, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in the acute myocardial infarction (AMI) cohort relative to the unstable angina (UA) cohort. We found white blood cell count (WBC) (OR: 4.110) and the effective average number of daily steps (ANS) (OR: 2.689) as independent prognostic risk factors for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The independent risk factors for unstable angina prognosis were white blood cell count (OR: 6.257), VO2 at anaerobic threshold (OR: 4.294), and effective autonomic nervous system function (OR: 4.097). The whole prognostic risk assessment score for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is 5 points, with 0 points signifying low risk, 2–3 points representing intermediate risk, and 5 points indicating high risk. The overall prognostic risk assessment score for UA is 7 points, with 0–3 classified as low risk, 4–5 as intermediate risk, and 6–7 as high risk. Conclusion: This study developed a multimodal predictive model that integrates the inflammatory response after onset, physical performance and exercise tolerance before discharge, and daily activity after discharge to predict the long-term prognosis of patients with ACS. The multidimensional model is more effective than the single-factor model for assessing risk in ACS patients. This work also establishes a theoretical basis for improving the prognosis of potentially high-risk individuals with accurate and reasonable exercise prescriptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bojian Wang & Yanwei Du & Pengyu Cao & Min Liu & Jinting Yang & Ningning Zhang & Wangshu Shao & Lijing Zhao & Rongyu Li & Lin Wang, 2025. "Development of a multidimensional prediction model for long-term prognostic risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective observational cohor," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318445
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318445
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318445&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0318445?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.