Author
Listed:
- Sha Wang
- Jingjin Zhao
- Xinzhu Chen
- Liangzhen Zhou
- Wenyao Cui
Abstract
Introduction: Moyamoya disease (MMD) commonly presents with cerebral ischemia or hemorrhage. Revascularization surgery, including direct, indirect, and combined bypasses, remains the mainstay of MMD treatment aiming to reduce stroke recurrence. However, the long-term outcomes of these interventions are still controversial. Herein, we designed the protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the three different revascularization surgeries in adult MMD patients for more than 5 years long-term outcomes. Methods: Our systematic review and meta-analysis protocol follows the PRISMA-P guidelines. Bypass surgeries for MMD will be included only if the follow-up time is more than 5 years. The primary outcome is the incidence of recurrent cerebral ischemia or hemorrhage. The secondary outcomes include functional outcomes evaluated by the Moyamoya Disease outcome category, mortality, and angiographic outcomes such as bypass patency, and collateral formation. Results: Studies on the postoperative outcomes of revascularization surgeries to treat adult MMD patients will be included and analyzed. This systematic review and meta-analysis will offer evidence to clinicians and researchers on the long-term outcomes of revascularization surgeries in adult MMD patients and help to optimize the selection of bypass modality.
Suggested Citation
Sha Wang & Jingjin Zhao & Xinzhu Chen & Liangzhen Zhou & Wenyao Cui, 2025.
"Long-term outcomes after revascularization surgery for adult moyamoya disease: Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-9, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0318370
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318370
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.