Author
Listed:
- Thomas Prince
- Andrea Bommert
- Jörg Rahnenführer
- Matthias Schmid
Abstract
Inverse probability weighting (IPW) is a popular method for making inferences regarding unobserved or unobservable data of a target population based on observed data. This paper considers IPW applied to right-censored time-to-event data. We investigate the behavior of the inverse-probability-of-censoring weighted (IPCW) Brier score, which is frequently used to assess the predictive performance of time-to-event models. A key requirement of the IPCW Brier score is the estimation of the censoring distribution, which is needed to compute the weights. The established paradigm of splitting a dataset into a training and a test set for model fitting and evaluation raises the question which of these datasets to use in order to fit the censoring model. There seems to be considerable disagreement between authors with regards to this issue, and no standard has been established so far. To shed light on this important question, we conducted a comprehensive experimental study exploring various data scenarios and estimation schemes. We found that it is generally of little importance which dataset is used to model the censoring distribution. However, in some circumstances, such as in the case of a covariate-dependent censoring process, a small sample size, or when dealing with noisy data, it may be advisable to use the test set instead of the training set to model the censoring distribution. A detailed set of practical recommendations concludes our paper.
Suggested Citation
Thomas Prince & Andrea Bommert & Jörg Rahnenführer & Matthias Schmid, 2025.
"On the estimation of inverse-probability-of-censoring weights for the evaluation of survival prediction error,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-22, January.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0318349
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318349
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.