IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0318288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupational profile and prevalence of workplace accidents among beach workers

Author

Listed:
  • Cleber Cremonese
  • Adedayo Michael Awoniyi
  • Mariela Sousa dos Santos
  • Jailma dos Santos Silva
  • Thayane Silva Nunes
  • Wiler de Paula Dias
  • Joelma Marques Rodrigues
  • Juliana Cristina dos Santos Soares
  • Armando Meyer

Abstract

Background: Workplace accidents (WAs) are acute, often preventable events that result in injuries or functional impairments, typically arising from occupation-related activities. In 2019, an estimated 395 million workers worldwide suffered non-fatal work-related injuries, with 330,000 fatalities, the majority occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Brazil. The true figures may be considerably higher due to underreporting, as many informal workers lack adequate social protection and may avoid reporting accidents for fear of jeopardizing their livelihood. Objective: To assess the prevalence of WAs and their association with demographic and occupational determinants among beach workers in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, between 2023 and 2024. Methods: A cross-sectional epidemiological study was conducted with 579 urban beach workers in Salvador from November 2023 to March 2024. Following ethical approval and participants’ consent, questionnaires were administered to gather data on sociodemographic and occupational characteristics, workplace environments and processes, workplace-related injuries and illnesses, and history and characteristics of WA. WA prevalence and prevalence ratios were calculated, and associations were analyzed using a Poisson regression model with robust variance. Results: Among the workers, 59.4% were males, 25% were aged ≤29 years and 11.4% were ≥60 years. Black and brown individuals represented 92.9% of the population. The most performed activities were street vendors (43.6%) and waiters (25%). Informal employment was reported by 72.3% of workers, 70.2% worked ≥9 hours per day, and 88% had no occupational training. The overall WA prevalence observed was 40.3%, with workers ≤29 years old having a 2.59 times higher likelihood of experiencing WA compared to those ≥60 years old. The most common WAs were punctures (42.7%), cuts (28.4%) and burns (12.1%). Conclusions: The high prevalence of WA among beach workers, especially those ≤29 years old, may be associated with inadequate working conditions, including long working hours and lack of occupational training. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to improve working conditions and reduce WA risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Cleber Cremonese & Adedayo Michael Awoniyi & Mariela Sousa dos Santos & Jailma dos Santos Silva & Thayane Silva Nunes & Wiler de Paula Dias & Joelma Marques Rodrigues & Juliana Cristina dos Santos Soa, 2025. "Occupational profile and prevalence of workplace accidents among beach workers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318288
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318288
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318288&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0318288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.