IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0318122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Temporal equal and active participation in synchronous collaborative learning: Antecedents and effect for learning

Author

Listed:
  • Sixiong Peng
  • Shunsaku Komatsuzaki
  • Ryota Sen

Abstract

For teaching 21st century skills, collaborative learning has been increasingly adopted in educational programs nowadays. However, learners often fail to engage in effective collaboration, which severely deteriorates learning gains. To develop support tools for collaborative learning, participation is one of the promising aspects considering its effect on learning gains and its viability for real-time measurement in modern learning environments. This study quantitatively and qualitatively examined the relationship between temporal equal and active participation and learning gains in synchronous collaboration. Our data included 10 teams that collaboratively learn analogical thinking in university coursework. Our result demonstrated the positive relationship between temporal equal and active participation and team learning gains. Detailed observation revealed that equal and active participation often reflected joint information processing which in turn affected learning gains, although this relationship depends on the discussion contents. The effect could be direct, indirect or absent depending on discussion topics and other factors. Our comparative analysis also proposed three antecedents for equal and active participation; maintaining a shared understanding of what to discuss and why to discuss, critical comments for extending discussion, and arguing without completion. We lastly summarized our theoretical implications for equal and active participation and practical implications for supporting collaborative learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Sixiong Peng & Shunsaku Komatsuzaki & Ryota Sen, 2025. "Temporal equal and active participation in synchronous collaborative learning: Antecedents and effect for learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318122
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318122
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318122&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0318122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.