IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0317811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delivering systems-level change to improve post-diagnostic dementia support: Qualitative findings from the PriDem study

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Spencer
  • Katie Flanagan
  • Marie Poole
  • Federica D’Andrea
  • Maud Hevink
  • Jane Wilcock
  • Kate Walters
  • Louise Robinson
  • Greta Rait
  • Sarah Griffiths
  • on behalf of the PriDem Study project team

Abstract

Background: There are 900,000 people with dementia in England and Wales. Existing models of post-diagnostic support are unsustainable and unaffordable. The PriDem programme developed a new model of primary care-based dementia care, whereby a Clinical Dementia Lead (CDL) would facilitate systems-level change. Aim: To assess barriers and facilitators to implementation of the PriDem intervention. Methods: 7 general practices participated in a qualitative process evaluation, as part of the mixed-methods feasibility and implementation study. Practices were located within 4 Primary Care Networks in the North East and South East of England. 26 healthcare professionals, 14 people with dementia and 16 carers linked to participating general practices participated in semi-structured individual and small group interviews. Additional qualitative data were generated through nonparticipant observations and researcher fieldnotes from CDL intervention supervision sessions. Data were analysed using abductive codebook thematic analysis informed by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). Results: Six themes were generated: 1) The rocky ground of primary care; 2) The power of people; 3) Tension between adaptability and fidelity; 4) Challenging the status quo: reimagining care planning; 5) One size doesn’t fit all; 6) Positive effects on people and systems: towards sustainability. Through the lens of NPT we can understand the contextual challenges facing primary care, the mechanisms (e.g., work undertaken by individuals) to overcome those challenges, as well as the potential outcomes of such an approach, in terms of longer-term sustainability of changes made. Conclusions: Despite the pressures facing primary care within England and Wales, meaningful change can be made to practice in the care of people with dementia. The presence of motivated and engaged staff are critical to implementation, as is ensuring understanding of complex interventions, so that fidelity can be maintained. People with dementia and carers benefitted from improved care systems. Commissioners should consider the benefits of a CDL-led approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Spencer & Katie Flanagan & Marie Poole & Federica D’Andrea & Maud Hevink & Jane Wilcock & Kate Walters & Louise Robinson & Greta Rait & Sarah Griffiths & on behalf of the PriDem Study project te, 2025. "Delivering systems-level change to improve post-diagnostic dementia support: Qualitative findings from the PriDem study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317811
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317811
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317811&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0317811?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.