IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0317801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A feature-based approach for atlas selection in automatic pelvic segmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Guoping Shan
  • Xue Bai
  • Yun Ge
  • Binbing Wang

Abstract

Accurate and efficient automatic segmentation is essential for various clinical tasks such as radiotherapy treatment planning. However, atlas-based segmentation still faces challenges due to the lack of representative atlas dataset and the computational limitations of deformation algorithms. In this work, we have proposed an atlas selection procedure (subset atlas grouping approach, MAS-SAGA) which utilized both image similarity and volume features for selecting the best-fitting atlases for contour propagation. A dataset of anonymized female pelvic Computed Tomography (CT) images demonstrated that MAS-SAGA significantly outperforms conventional multi-atlas-based segmentation (cMAS) in terms of Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95th Percentile Hausdorff Distance (95HD) for bladder and rectum segmentation using a three-fold cross-validation strategy. The proposed procedure also reduced computation time compared to cMAS, making it a promising tool for medical image analysis applications. In addition, we have evaluated two distinct atlas selection methods: the Feature-based Atlas Selection Approach (MAS-FASA) and the Similarity-based Atlas Selection Approach (MAS-SIM). We investigate the differences between these two methods in terms of their ability to select the best fitting atlases. The findings demonstrated that MAS-FASA selected different atlases than MAS-SIM, resulting in improved segmentation performance overall. It highlighted the potential of feature-based subgrouping techniques in enhancing the efficacy of MAS algorithms in the field of medical image segmentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Guoping Shan & Xue Bai & Yun Ge & Binbing Wang, 2025. "A feature-based approach for atlas selection in automatic pelvic segmentation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317801
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317801
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317801&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0317801?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.