IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0317744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity and reliability of the Malay version of the PSC-12 scale among healthcare workers in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Norhasliza Abu Bakar
  • Awang Bulgiba
  • Marzuki Isahak

Abstract

The prime instrument used to measure Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC) at the workplace is the PSC-12 scale questionnaire, which has been widely used by researchers worldwide. We set out to translate the PSC-12 scale into Malay and validate it among Malaysian healthcare workers, the first time this has ever been attempted. We carried out a cross-sectional study among 250 healthcare workers from 3 government health clinics and 15 identified clinical work units in a public hospital in the Klang Valley area, Malaysia. The English version of the PSC-12 scale was translated into the Malay language (Bahasa Malaysia) and back into English to check for content accuracy and validity. Psychometric properties of the questionnaire were assessed for internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient), temporal stability for test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation) and construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis). The translated questionnaire had a persistently high content validity-index (CV-I) of 0.916. The hypothesised four-factor-structure model displayed high goodness of fit indices (RMSEA = 0.081, SRMR = 0.032, GFI = 0.919, AGFI = 0.869, CFI = 0.961, and TLI = 0.946), demonstrating good questionnaire construct validity. Each item subscale in the PSC-12 scale showed satisfactory internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha (α) coefficient between 0.895 to 0.921. There was satisfactory temporal stability and test-retest reliability with ICC (2,1) for scores of 0.954 (total item score), 0.897 (Domain 1 score), 0.910 (Domain 2 score), 0.807 (Domain 3 score) and 0.806 (Domain 4 score) over the two-week interval. The Malay version of the PSC-12 scale is a valid and reliable instrument for use among healthcare workers in Malaysia as evidenced by its satisfactory psychometric measure and construct structure properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Norhasliza Abu Bakar & Awang Bulgiba & Marzuki Isahak, 2025. "Validity and reliability of the Malay version of the PSC-12 scale among healthcare workers in Malaysia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317744
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317744
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317744&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0317744?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.