Author
Listed:
- Gustavo Moura Maidana
- Marcos Antônio Ferreira Júnior
- Felipe Machado Mota
- Andréia Insabralde de Queiroz Cardoso
- Bruna Dias Abes
- Mayra Dias
- Letícia Lima Meza
Abstract
Introduction: Diseases affecting the cornea are a group of pathological conditions responsible for the main causes of blindness worldwide. Corneal transplantation aims to replace dysfunctional corneal tissue with a transparent tissue graft obtained from a deceased donor, which enables the full recovery of lost vision. Processes are initially performed to prepare the corneal tissue for transplantation in order for this transplant to be viable. There is a gap in knowledge regarding the costs of these processes. This review aims to carry out a robust, broad and current mapping of studies which analyze the costs of processing corneal tissue for transplantation. Objective: The objective of this study is to map the evidence produced in the literature on cost analysis studies of corneal tissue processing. Materials and methods: A scoping review will be conducted to map the topic, gather different research designs and identify the available scientific evidence on corneal tissue processing. To this end, a scoping review protocol was developed, registered in the Open Science Framework (accessed at: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/2X89U), following the good practices described by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The review report will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. The data will be presented descriptively, with a summary of the studies found. The guiding research question of the study is: What is the scope of scientific evidence on the cost analysis of corneal tissue processing for transplants?
Suggested Citation
Gustavo Moura Maidana & Marcos Antônio Ferreira Júnior & Felipe Machado Mota & Andréia Insabralde de Queiroz Cardoso & Bruna Dias Abes & Mayra Dias & Letícia Lima Meza, 2025.
"Cost analysis of corneal tissue processing: A scoping review protocol,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-7, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0317681
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317681
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.