IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0317602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing pearl millet yield forecasting: Comparative analysis of individual and ensemble machine learning approaches over Rajasthan, India

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Alsaber
  • Parul Setiya
  • Anurag Satpathi
  • Abrar Aljamaan
  • Jiazhu Pan

Abstract

Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) is a resilient crop known for its ability to thrive in arid and semi-arid regions, making it a crucial staple in regions prone to drought. Rajasthan, a state in India, emerged as the top producer of pearl millet. This study enhances yield forecasting for pearl millet using machine learning models across nine districts viz. Jaipur, Ajmer, Jodhpur, Bikaner, Bharatpur, Alwar, Sikar, Jhunjhunu and Nagaur in Rajasthan, India. Data from 1997–2019 (23 years), including yield data from the Directorate of Economics and Statistics and weather data from the NASA POWER web portal, were analysed. The study employed individual machine learning methods (GLM, ELNET, XGB, SVR and RF) and their ensemble combinations (GLM, ELNET, Cubist and RF). Discerning the overall best performing model across all locations remained challenging. For instance, while ensemble models exhibited subpar performance in Barmer and Nagaur, their performance ranged from satisfactory to commendable in other locations. To identify the best model, all models were ranked based on their R2 and nRMSE (%) values. Combined average ranks during training and testing revealed the model performance ranking as I-XGB (3.83) > I-GLM (4.28) > E-ELNET (4.32) > I-RF (4.67) > E-GLM (4.88) > I-SVR (4.90) > I-ELNET (4.94) > E-RF (6.03) > E-Cubist (7.15), where I denotes individual model, while E denotes ensemble model. Intriguingly, while individual GLM and XGB models demonstrated superior performance during calibration, they exhibited poorer performance during validation, potentially indicating issues of data overfitting. Hence, the ensemble ELNET approach is recommended for accurate prediction of pearl millet yield, followed by the individual RF model. These performances underscore the importance of tailored model selection based on specific geographic and environmental conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Alsaber & Parul Setiya & Anurag Satpathi & Abrar Aljamaan & Jiazhu Pan, 2025. "Advancing pearl millet yield forecasting: Comparative analysis of individual and ensemble machine learning approaches over Rajasthan, India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317602
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317602
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317602&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0317602?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.