IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0317600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decoupled level and flow rate control of a two-tank system in beverage production: A comparative analysis of Fuzzy-PID and GA-PID for minimum time operation

Author

Listed:
  • Tamiru Demelash Kassie
  • Mebratu Sintie Geremew
  • Kassahun Ashagrie Chanie

Abstract

Due to the nonlinear characteristics of the valves and the interactions between the controlled variables, designing a control system for coupled tanks is a difficult task. This paper deals with the comparative study between Fuzzy-PID and GA-PID controllers for decoupling level and flow rate control of two tank systems for beverage factories with minimum time optimal operation. In most process control industries, each process requires multiple control variables. Here two input two output (TITO) systems are considered highly interacting multivariable control systems. The decoupling control scheme (Pre-compensator (dynamic) decoupling) is used to reduce the correlation between the controlled and manipulated variables by diagonalizing the system. The two independent SISO systems are further controlled by different controllers so that the system can trace the set point and yield a good time response. Two radically different control approaches are presented and compared for this system’s dynamics, motivated by a desire to provide precise liquid-level control and regulate the flow rate. MATLAB /Simulink model and tuning algorithm (GA) are used for simulation. As the simulation result ensured, the GA-PID controller is the used for the specified system which is based on the transient and steady-state specifications. Quantitatively; the GA-PID controller has 39.167ms rise time, 8.50sec settling time, and -0.393% overshoot; whereas FLC-PID has 118.101ms rise time, 8.65sec settling time, and -0.033% overshoot. But in GA with PID controllers, the external disturbance tolerance capability of the proposed scheme, meaning robustness against external disturbance has a slight difference and FLC-PID has perfectly achieved the robustness. Depending on the result, FLC-PID has more result than GA-PID controller based on the set of specifications. Hence robustness is more important than time performances.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamiru Demelash Kassie & Mebratu Sintie Geremew & Kassahun Ashagrie Chanie, 2025. "Decoupled level and flow rate control of a two-tank system in beverage production: A comparative analysis of Fuzzy-PID and GA-PID for minimum time operation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317600
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317600
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317600&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0317600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.