IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0317340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical students’ perception of paid E-learning

Author

Listed:
  • Parsa Mohri
  • Yilmaz Onat Koyluoglu
  • Mustafa Ege Seker
  • S‚ehla Nurefs‚an Sancak
  • Mirkan Dikeç
  • Ayça Aydemir Mazlumoglu
  • Yesim Gurol
  • Ilhan Cem Sungur

Abstract

Background: In addition to the medical school curriculum, medical students often take the initiative to incorporate external paid digital educational resources, especially during the pandemic. In this study, we organized an exemplary questionnaire method to enable evidence-based decisions before providing paid e-learning resources to medical students. Methods: An online form was distributed to all registered medical students at a Turkish medical school, and the compiled responses were subjected to statistical analysis. The participants were queried about their general background, post-graduation plans, use of study materials, purpose and perceived benefits of utilizing paid e-learning resources, as well as any financial burden or opinions regarding the associated costs. Results: A total of 119 medical students participated in the online form. The findings revealed that 87% of the participants reported using paid e-learning resources for school exams, with 71.5% of them indicating an improvement in their exam scores. Approximately 26.1% of the participants did not specify any change. When asked to rate the cost of using paid e-learning resources on a scale of 1 to 10, the average score was 8.6 ± 1.58. Furthermore, 40% of the participants relied on repeated free demo sessions, while only 27% reported paying the fees associated with these resources. Conclusions: With the evolution of medical education, particularly in the aftermath of the pandemic, medical students are increasingly seeking to supplement their medical curriculum, pursue self-interests, and engage in extracurricular research by utilizing paid e-learning resources. However, the costs associated with these resources often prevent some students from fully benefiting from them. Therefore, it is essential for medical schools to make evidence-based decisions to support their students, recognizing that digitally available resources play an integral role in the assimilation of medical education.

Suggested Citation

  • Parsa Mohri & Yilmaz Onat Koyluoglu & Mustafa Ege Seker & S‚ehla Nurefs‚an Sancak & Mirkan Dikeç & Ayça Aydemir Mazlumoglu & Yesim Gurol & Ilhan Cem Sungur, 2025. "Medical students’ perception of paid E-learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317340
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317340
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317340&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0317340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.