IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0317103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating dosage effects of ovulation inhibitors on oocyte maturation in assisted reproductive technology: A retrospective study among patients with normal ovarian reserve

Author

Listed:
  • Mika Handa
  • Tsuyoshi Takiuchi
  • Sumika Kawaguchi
  • Yasuhiro Ohara
  • Masakazu Doshida
  • Takumi Takeuchi
  • Hidehiko Matsubayashi
  • Tomomoto Ishikawa
  • Sho Komukai
  • Tetsuhisa Kitamura
  • Tadashi Kimura

Abstract

The judicious selection of ovulation inhibitors in ovarian stimulation protocols is crucial for the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART). Herein, we investigate the dose-dependent effects of chlormadinone acetate (CMA) and cetrorelix, two distinct ovulation inhibitors, on oocyte maturation in patients with normal ovarian reserve, using univariable and multivariable Poisson regression analyses. Patients undergoing progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) with CMA (n = 299) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) with cetrorelix (n = 605) during their initial in vitro fertilization cycle were enrolled at our center from March 2018 to October 2020 (N = 904). The primary and secondary outcomes were the oocyte maturation and fertilization rates, respectively. After adjusting for several covariates including age, anti-Müllerian hormone levels, total gonadotropin dose, and type of trigger, we calculated the dose-dependent adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1 mg of CMA or 0.25 mg of cetrorelix. In the PPOS group, the median age was 34.0 years, and the median total CMA dosage was 22 mg (interquartile range [IQR]: 18.0–32.0). In the GnRH-ant group, the median age was 35.0 years, and the median total cetrorelix dosage was 0.5 mg (IQR 0.5–0.5). The aRR of the maturation rate was 1.003 (95% CI: 0.999–1.007) with PPOS (p = 0.194) and 1.009 (95% CI: 0.962–1.059) with GnRH-ant (p = 0.717). The aRR of the fertilization rate was 1.002 (95% CI: 0.985–1.020) with PPOS (p = 0.783) and 1.022 (95% CI: 0.839–1.246) with GnRH-ant (p = 0.829). Collectively, these findings indicate that within the applied dosages, ovulation inhibitors do not significantly impact oocyte maturation or fertilization rates in patients with normal ovarian reserve. These valuable insights can be applied when designing ART protocols and may guide clinicians in optimizing infertility treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • Mika Handa & Tsuyoshi Takiuchi & Sumika Kawaguchi & Yasuhiro Ohara & Masakazu Doshida & Takumi Takeuchi & Hidehiko Matsubayashi & Tomomoto Ishikawa & Sho Komukai & Tetsuhisa Kitamura & Tadashi Kimura, 2025. "Investigating dosage effects of ovulation inhibitors on oocyte maturation in assisted reproductive technology: A retrospective study among patients with normal ovarian reserve," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317103
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317103
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317103&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0317103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.