IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0317095.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring social, economic, policy, and health system determinants of maternal health and survival: An urgent global priority

Author

Listed:
  • R Rima Jolivet
  • Jewel Gausman
  • Ana Langer

Abstract

In 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) released global targets and strategies for reducing maternal mortality in the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) period developed through broad stakeholder consultations. The targets and strategies identified in the “Strategies toward Ending Preventable Maternal Mortality (EPMM)” report are grounded in a systemic and human rights approach to maternal health and aim to address the broad spectrum of key social, political, economic, and health system determinants of maternal health and survival, as exemplified by 11 Key Themes. These upstream determinants of maternal survival are not well represented in maternal health measurement efforts, which tend to focus on service delivery. Thus, work was undertaken to develop a core set of maternal health indicators that could drive progress toward achieving the recommendations laid out in the EPMM Strategies that identified a menu of 25 indicators and 7 standard stratifiers related to the legal and policy environment, accountability mechanisms, inequities in access and quality, and empowerment of women, girls, families, and communities. Measurement experts have called for more research to ensure that indicators for monitoring maternal health, including its upstream determinants, are valid, which is critical if such measures are to be effective for driving and tracking progress toward ending preventable maternal deaths. This paper describes nine research reports emanating from seven discrete research studies to validate ten indicators in India, Ghana and Argentina that are compiled in a PLOS Collection with the aim of illustrating the breadth of the validation work, extracting some unifying themes and common findings, and discussing the implications for policy and practice they suggest.

Suggested Citation

  • R Rima Jolivet & Jewel Gausman & Ana Langer, 2025. "Measuring social, economic, policy, and health system determinants of maternal health and survival: An urgent global priority," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317095
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317095
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317095&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0317095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jewel Gausman & Ernest Kenu & Richard Adanu & Delia A B Bandoh & Mabel Berrueta & Suchandrima Chakraborty & Nizamuddin Khan & Ana Langer & Carolina Nigri & Magdalene A Odikro & Verónica Pingray & Sowm, 2024. "Validating the indicator “maternal death review coverage” to improve maternal mortality data: A retrospective analysis of district, facility, and individual medical record data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Ann-Beth Moller & Holly Newby & Claudia Hanson & Alison Morgan & Shams El Arifeen & Doris Chou & Theresa Diaz & Lale Say & Ian Askew & Allisyn C Moran, 2018. "Measures matter: A scoping review of maternal and newborn indicators," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0171804 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Caitlin R Williams & Paula Vázquez & Carolina Nigri & Richard M Adanu & Delia A B Bandoh & Mabel Berrueta & Suchandrima Chakraborty & Jewel Gausman & Ernest Kenu & Nizamuddin Khan & Ana Langer & Magda, 2023. "Improving measures of access to legal abortion: A validation study triangulating multiple data sources to assess a global indicator," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lenka Benova & Ann-Beth Moller & Allisyn C Moran, 2019. "“What gets measured better gets done better”: The landscape of validation of global maternal and newborn health indicators through key informant interviews," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0233969 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Alan de Brauw & Amber Peterman, 2020. "Can conditional cash transfers improve maternal health care? Evidence from El Salvador's Comunidades Solidarias Rurales program," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 700-715, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.