IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0317054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence and features of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, United States, 2016–2022

Author

Listed:
  • Kaitlin Benedict
  • Jeremy A W Gold
  • Mitsuru Toda
  • Joy Hsu

Abstract

The epidemiology of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) in the United States is not well-described. To estimate national ABPA prevalence among patients with asthma or cystic fibrosis, characterize ABPA testing practices, and describe ABPA clinical features, treatment, and 6-month outcomes. We used the 2016–2022 Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial/Medicare and Multi-State Medicaid Databases to identify cohorts of patients with 1) asthma, 2) cystic fibrosis (CF), and 3) ABPA. We calculated ABPA prevalence per 10,000 patients with asthma or CF, assessed diagnostic testing for ABPA among patients with severe asthma, and described features of patients with ABPA using diagnosis and procedure codes. The overall ABPA prevalence among patients with asthma was 2.8/10,000 (Commercial/Medicare) and 1.0/10,000 (Medicaid). ABPA prevalence increased with asthma severity (Commercial/Medicare: mild 1.3, moderate 9.3, severe 70.6, Medicaid: mild 0.3, moderate 2.4, severe 32.4). Among patients with CF, ABPA prevalence was 183.7/10,000 (Commercial/Medicare) and 134.6/10,000 (Medicaid). Among patients with severe asthma, 10.3% (Commercial/Medicare) and 7.4% (Medicaid) received total immunoglobulin E testing, which is recommended for ABPA diagnosis. Among all patients with ABPA (Commercial/Medicare: n = 1,564, Medicaid: n = 410), ABPA treatments included inhaled corticosteroids (>70%), systemic corticosteroids (>62%), and antifungals (>18%). Patients with ABPA and Medicaid were more likely to experience hospitalization (45.1% vs. 22.5% of patients with Commercial/Medicare insurance) and respiratory failure (18.5% vs. 10.9%). This analysis provides initial estimates of national ABPA prevalence. Further studies could identify potential barriers to ABPA testing and investigate potential factors affecting payer-related differences in ABPA burden.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaitlin Benedict & Jeremy A W Gold & Mitsuru Toda & Joy Hsu, 2025. "Prevalence and features of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, United States, 2016–2022," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317054
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317054
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317054&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0317054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.