IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316996.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automated mold defects classification in paintings: A comparison of machine learning and rule-based techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Hilman Nordin
  • Bushroa Abdul Razak
  • Norrima Mokhtar
  • Mohd Fadzil Jamaludin
  • Adeel Mehmood

Abstract

Mold defects pose a significant risk to the preservation of valuable fine art paintings, typically arising from fungal growth in humid environments. This paper presents a novel approach for detecting and categorizing mold defects in fine art paintings. The technique leverages a feature extraction method called Derivative Level Thresholding to pinpoint suspicious regions within an image. Subsequently, these regions are classified as mold defects using either morphological filtering or machine learning models such as Classification and Regression Trees (CART) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA). The efficacy of these methods was evaluated using the Mold Features Dataset (MFD) and a separate set of test images. Results indicate that both methods improve the accuracy and precision of mold defect detection compared to no classifier. However, the CART algorithm exhibits superior performance, increasing precision by 32% to 53% while maintaining high accuracy (96%) even with an imbalanced dataset. This innovative method has the potential to transform the approach to managing mold defects in fine art paintings by offering a more precise and efficient means of identification. By enabling early detection of mold defects, this method can play a crucial role in safeguarding these invaluable artworks for future generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilman Nordin & Bushroa Abdul Razak & Norrima Mokhtar & Mohd Fadzil Jamaludin & Adeel Mehmood, 2025. "Automated mold defects classification in paintings: A comparison of machine learning and rule-based techniques," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316996
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316996
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316996&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316996?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.