IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social influence and consensus building: Introducing a q-voter model with weighted influence

Author

Listed:
  • Pratik Mullick
  • Parongama Sen

Abstract

We present a model of opinion formation where an individual’s opinion is influenced by interactions with a group of agents. The model introduces a novel bias mechanism that favors one opinion, a feature not previously explored. In the absence of bias, the system reduces to a mean field voter model. We identify three regimes: favoring negative opinions, favoring positive opinions, and a neutral case. In large systems, equilibrium outcomes become independent of group size, with only the bias influencing the final consensus. For smaller groups, however, the time to reach equilibrium depends on group size. Our results show that even a small initial bias leads to a consensus, with all agents eventually sharing the same opinion if the bias is not zero. The system also exhibits critical slowing down near the neutral bias, which acts as a dynamical threshold. The time to reach consensus scales logarithmically for non-neutral biases and linearly with system size for the neutral case. While short-term dynamics are influenced by group size, long-term behavior is determined solely by the bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Pratik Mullick & Parongama Sen, 2025. "Social influence and consensus building: Introducing a q-voter model with weighted influence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316889
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316889
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316889&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Sales-Pardo & Daniel Diermeier & Luís A Nunes Amaral, 2013. "The Impact of Individual Biases on Consensus Formation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-8, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minsung Kim & Minki Kim, 2014. "Group-Wise Herding Behavior in Financial Markets: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-7, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.