IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of robot-assisted task-oriented training intervention for upper limb and daily living skills in stroke patients: A meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chengzhu Jin
  • Yonghuan Chen
  • Yuanyuan Ma

Abstract

Purpose: Stroke is one of the leading causes of acquired disability in adults in high-income countries. This study aims to determine the intervention effects of robot-assisted task-oriented training on enhancing the upper limb function and daily living skills of stroke patients. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases through March 1, 2024. This process yielded 1,649 articles, from which 15 studies with 574 samples met the inclusion criteria for analysis. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We performed meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, regression analyses, and sensitivity analyses using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 17.0. Furthermore, publication bias was assessed using Begg’s and Egger’s tests. This study is registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42024513483). Results: A random effects model was utilized. The results indicated that robot-assisted task-oriented training significantly improved Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores compared to the control group [SMD = 1.01, 95% CI (0.57, 1.45)]. Similarly, robot-assisted task-oriented training demonstrated a significant effect on the Modified Barthel Index scores [SMD = 0.61, 95% CI (0.41, 0.82)]. Subgroup and regression analyses revealed that the use of combined interventions, the geographical region of the first author, and the age of the subjects did not appear to be sources of high heterogeneity. Publication bias tests using the FMA-UE as an outcome measure yielded Begg’s test (p = 0.76) and Egger’s test (p = 0.93), suggesting no significant publication bias. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the study findings. Conclusions: Robot-assisted task-oriented training significantly enhances the rehabilitation of upper limb function and the recovery of daily living skills in stroke patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengzhu Jin & Yonghuan Chen & Yuanyuan Ma, 2025. "Effectiveness of robot-assisted task-oriented training intervention for upper limb and daily living skills in stroke patients: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316633
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316633
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316633&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.