IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-validation of prediction equations for estimating the body mass index in adults without the use of body weight

Author

Listed:
  • Júlio César Chaves Nunes Filho
  • Marilia Porto Oliveira Nunes
  • Robson Salviano de Matos
  • Daniel Vieira Pinto
  • Dyego Castelo Branco Holanda Gadelha Pereira
  • Thais Amanda Silva Pereira Castelo Branco
  • Geraldo Bezerra Da Silva Júnior
  • Janaina de Almeida Mota Ramalho
  • Elizabeth De Francesco Daher

Abstract

Introduction: Body Mass Index (BMI) is a widely accepted measure by the World Health Organization for assessing body composition, as it provides critical insights into health risks, life expectancy, and quality of life. However, in resource-limited settings, access to weighing scales is often inadequate, and environmental conditions, such as unstable terrain, may hinder accurate weight measurements. In these contexts, alternative methods for estimating BMI become essential for effective health assessment. This study aimed to develop and validate equations to estimate BMI without relying on body weight, providing a practical tool for nutritional assessment where traditional methods are not feasible. Materials and methods: Adults aged 18 to 59 of both sexes were included. Variables like waist circumference, height, hip circumference, age, and weight were used for equation development and validation. Participants were divided by sex, with regression and validation subgroups for each. Statistical tests included Student’s t-tests, Pearson correlation, Stepwise Regression, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Weighted Kappa Coefficient, and Bland-Altman statistics. Results: The study included 810 adults, with 63% (576) women. No significant differences were found in paired comparisons between regression and validation subgroups for both sexes (p > 0.05). Four equations were proposed for BMI estimation: EM2 and EM3 for males, and EF2 and EF3 for females. All equations showed strong positive correlations (r > 0.90), significant at p

Suggested Citation

  • Júlio César Chaves Nunes Filho & Marilia Porto Oliveira Nunes & Robson Salviano de Matos & Daniel Vieira Pinto & Dyego Castelo Branco Holanda Gadelha Pereira & Thais Amanda Silva Pereira Castelo Branc, 2025. "Cross-validation of prediction equations for estimating the body mass index in adults without the use of body weight," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316610
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316610
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316610&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.