IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia

Author

Listed:
  • Junying Wei
  • Heshan Cao
  • Mingling Peng
  • Yinzhou Zhang
  • Sibei Li
  • Wuhua Ma
  • Yuhui Li

Abstract

Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common nosocomial infection in ICU, significantly associated with poor outcomes. However, there is currently a lack of reliable and interpretable tools for assessing the risk of in-hospital mortality in VAP patients. This study aims to develop an interpretable machine learning (ML) prediction model to enhance the assessment of in-hospital mortality risk in VAP patients. Methods: This study extracted VAP patient data from versions 2.2 and 3.1 of the MIMIC-IV database, using version 2.2 for model training and validation, and version 3.1 for external testing. Feature selection was conducted using the Boruta algorithm, and 14 ML models were constructed. The optimal model was identified based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity across both validation and test cohorts. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was applied for global and local interpretability. Results: A total of 1,894 VAP patients were included, with 12 features ultimately selected for model construction: 24-hour urine output, blood urea nitrogen, age, diastolic blood pressure, platelet count, anion gap, body temperature, bicarbonate level, sodium level, body mass index, and whether combined with congestive heart failure and cerebrovascular disease. The random forest (RF) model showed the best performance, achieving an AUC of 0.780 in internal validation and 0.724 in external testing, outperforming other ML models and common clinical scoring systems. Conclusion: The RF model demonstrated robust and reliable performance in predicting in-hospital mortality risk for VAP patients. The developed online tool can assist clinicians in efficiently assessing VAP in-hospital mortality risk, supporting clinical decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Junying Wei & Heshan Cao & Mingling Peng & Yinzhou Zhang & Sibei Li & Wuhua Ma & Yuhui Li, 2025. "An interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316526
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316526
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316526&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316526?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fiona Howroyd & Cyril Chacko & Andrew MacDuff & Nandan Gautam & Brian Pouchet & Bill Tunnicliffe & Jonathan Weblin & Fang Gao-Smith & Zubair Ahmed & Niharika A. Duggal & Tonny Veenith, 2024. "Ventilator-associated pneumonia: pathobiological heterogeneity and diagnostic challenges," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.