IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three hospitalized non-critical COVID-19 subphenotypes and change in intubation or death over time: A latent class analysis with external and longitudinal validation

Author

Listed:
  • William S Stringer
  • Amy S Labar
  • Joshua D Geleris
  • Evan V Sholle
  • David A Berlin
  • Claire M McGroder
  • Matthew J Cummings
  • Max R O’Donnell
  • Haoyang Yi
  • Xuehan Yang
  • Ying Wei
  • Edward J Schenck
  • Matthew R Baldwin

Abstract

Background: There are two subphenotypes of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome with differential responses to corticosteroids, but whether similar subphenotypes of hospitalized non-critical COVID-19 patients exist remains unknown. Objective: To identify and validate non-critical COVID-19 subphenotypes at hospital admission that may elucidate pathobiology and facilitate heterogeneity-of-treatment effect analyses of clinical trials with non-critical COVID-19 patients. Methods: We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 who were not intubated or did not die within 24 hours of admission. We derived and externally and longitudinally validated subphenotypes during the wild-type and delta severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2) waves via latent class analysis using clinical and laboratory data at hospital admission. We trained XGBoost machine learning models to predict subphenotype. Results: We analyzed data for 4,827 hospitalized non-critical COVID-19 patients: 2,077 wild-type wave Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) and affiliate hospital derivation cohort patients; 1,214 wild-type wave Cornell Medical Center and affiliate hospital external validation cohort patients; and 1,536 delta wave CUMC and affiliate hospital longitudinal validation cohort patients. A three-class latent class model best fit each cohort identifying subphenotypes that were low-inflammatory, intermediate-inflammatory, and high-inflammatory with fibrinolysis, with increasing 90-day risk of intubation or death across subphenotypes in the wild-type wave. However, in the delta wave, the intermediate-inflammatory subphenotype had the lowest 90-day risk of intubation or death. XGBoost model area under the receiver-operating-curve was 0.96 in the testing dataset, and biomarkers of inflammation and cardiorenal dysfunction were the strongest predictors of subphenotype. Conclusion: We identified three hospitalized non-critical COVID-19 subphenotypes that persisted through the wild-type and delta SARS-CoV2 waves. The intermediate-inflammatory subphenotype had the greatest relative improvement in intubation and survival over time with the standardized use of corticosteroids and other interventions. Our machine learning model can facilitate heterogeneity-of-treatment effect analyses of clinical trials of adults hospitalized with non-critical COVID-19.

Suggested Citation

  • William S Stringer & Amy S Labar & Joshua D Geleris & Evan V Sholle & David A Berlin & Claire M McGroder & Matthew J Cummings & Max R O’Donnell & Haoyang Yi & Xuehan Yang & Ying Wei & Edward J Schenck, 2025. "Three hospitalized non-critical COVID-19 subphenotypes and change in intubation or death over time: A latent class analysis with external and longitudinal validation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316434
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316434
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316434&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316434?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.