Author
Listed:
- Chidozie Declan Iwu
- Pramita Shrestha
- Alyson J Littman
- Julia E Hood
Abstract
Introduction: Shingles is a debilitating vaccine preventable disease that poses a health threat to older adults. However, the uptake of shingles vaccines remains low, and the factors contributing to the low uptake are not clearly understood. This study assessed the association between healthcare access and shingles vaccination among older adults, as well as the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on vaccine uptake. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study among adults 50 + years in Virginia (n = 16,576) using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2018, 2019, and 2021). We calculated the prevalence of shingles vaccination by health insurance and access to primary health care provider (used as proxies for healthcare access) and in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic (pre vs during). Log binomial regression models were used to estimate prevalence ratios (PR), adjusting for confounders. Results: Shingles vaccination was substantially higher among those with healthcare access compared to those without. Specifically, shingles vaccination was 35% among those with health insurance vs. 10% among those without (adjusted PR (aPR): 2.03, 95% CI 1.44, 2.86), and 36% among those with a primary healthcare provider vs 15% among those without (aPR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.65-2.41). Finally, shingles vaccination was 41% during the COVID-19 pandemic vs. 30% before (aPR:1.26, 95% CI: 1.20–1.33). Conclusion: Individuals with health insurance and access to a primary healthcare provider were significantly more likely to receive the shingles vaccine compared to those without such access. Moreover, the prevalence of shingles vaccination during the pandemic period was substantially higher compared with shingles vaccination before the pandemic.
Suggested Citation
Chidozie Declan Iwu & Pramita Shrestha & Alyson J Littman & Julia E Hood, 2025.
"The association between healthcare access and shingles vaccination among older adults in Virginia, United States,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-12, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0316429
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316429
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.