IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision’s (VMMC) strategy for HIV prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa, prevalence, risks, costs, benefits and best practice: A scoping review study protocol of progress and unfolding insights

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Maibvise
  • Takaedza Munangatire
  • Nestor Tomas
  • Daniel O Ashipala
  • Priscilla S Dlamini

Abstract

Campaigns to scale up Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision (VMMC) for the prevention of HIV transmission has been going on for years in selected Southern African countries, following recommendations from the World Health Organisations. Despite significant strides made in the initiative and its proven benefits, controversies surrounding the strategy have never ceased, and its future remains uncertain especially as some countries near their initial targets. Over the years, as the campaigns unfolded, a lot of insights have been generated in favour of continuing the VMMC campaigns, although some insights portray the impression that the strategy is not worthy of the risks and effort required, or that enough has been done, as the targets have now been achieved. This article proposes a scoping review that aims at synthesizing and consolidating that evidence into a baseline for a further systematic review aimed at developing sound recommendations for the future of the VMMC strategy for HIV prevention. The scoping review will target all scientific literature published on the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed as well as grey literature from Google Scholar and WHO Institutional Repository for Information Sharing (IRIS) from the inception of the campaigns. The review shall be guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) framework for scoping reviews, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist shall be followed. Discussion of the findings is envisioned to yield evidence that can be further analysed to give insights about risk/cost-benefits ratios of the strategy at this point in time as well as best clinical practices for the VMMC procedure, to inform the future of the strategy. This protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework, registration ID https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SFZC9.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Maibvise & Takaedza Munangatire & Nestor Tomas & Daniel O Ashipala & Priscilla S Dlamini, 2024. "Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision’s (VMMC) strategy for HIV prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa, prevalence, risks, costs, benefits and best practice: A scoping review study protocol of progress and un," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316106
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316106&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.