IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0314885.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative study to understand the facilitators of and barriers to retention in care to the national PMTCT Option B+ programme in Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Charity Kyomugisha-Nuwagaba
  • Rachel King
  • Rose Baryamutuma
  • Simon Muhumuza
  • Linda N Kisakye
  • William Bazeyo
  • Evelyn Akello

Abstract

Introduction: Effective prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) programmes require women and their infants to have access to a cascade of HIV care and treatment interventions. Retention in care reduces the risk of vertical transmission and opportunistic infections among mothers living with HIV. Uganda has made great strides in ensuring the success of the prevention of mother to child transmission program. Although an increasing number of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Uganda are benefiting from the rapid scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART), retention in HIV care and treatment services remains a major concern. Identifying and understanding the reasons for dropping out of care among mothers enrolled in the Option B+ program among those who were retained and those who dropped out is key to inform policy and program practice. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study to understand the facilitators of retention and reasons for loss to follow-up among HIV positive mothers in central Uganda who engaged in the Option B+ program. We conducted 29 focus group discussions (FGDs) with Village Health Teams (VHT) and ‘Peer Mothers’. We performed 21 in depth interviews (IDI) with mothers who had been lost to follow up during the post-partum period, and 27 among those who remained in care. These were conducted in 18 districts in Central Uganda. Results: Participants identified barriers and facilitators to retention in HIV care. Barriers included self-stigma and fear of disclosure, mental health challenges, community perceptions, poor health provider attitudes and structural challenges, lack of transportation and food, long waiting time at health facilities and client mobility. Both the clients retained and not retained in care discussed mental illness, feeling sick and competing priorities as barriers. Facilitators for retention in care included adequate community support systems, early initiation on ART, giving birth to HIV negative children and economic stability. These were noted as key enabling factors for retention. It was also highlighted that presence of friendly clinic staff members, scheduling reminders were important aspects of retention. Conclusion: Findings highlighting barriers covering personal, interpersonal, structural and community suggest that developing client-centered models addressing social and community barriers and provide more holistic services is key to retaining mother-infant pairs in care. Emphasis on the use of community health workers and provision of financing, as well as institutionalization of quality improvement would provide alternatives for overcoming barriers to retention in care.

Suggested Citation

  • Charity Kyomugisha-Nuwagaba & Rachel King & Rose Baryamutuma & Simon Muhumuza & Linda N Kisakye & William Bazeyo & Evelyn Akello, 2025. "A qualitative study to understand the facilitators of and barriers to retention in care to the national PMTCT Option B+ programme in Uganda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314885
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314885
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314885&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0314885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0187605 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.