IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0314825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration-based cytology for distinguishing malignant and benign pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cong Ding
  • Jian-feng Yang
  • Xia Wang
  • Yi-feng Zhou
  • Ye Gu
  • Qiang Liu
  • Hong-zhang Shen
  • Xiao-feng Zhang

Abstract

Background: Preoperative diagnosis of malignancy in patients with pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) remains challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA)-based cytology in differentiating malignant PCLs from benign PCLs. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed in multiple databases in November 2023. Studies differentiating benign and malignant PCLs via EUS-FNA-based cytology, in which the results were compared with those of surgical excision histopathology, were included in this meta-analysis. Data from the selected studies were pooled to summarize the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative LRs, diagnostic odds ratios and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves. Results: We included 755 patients from 15 distinct studies who underwent EUS-FNA-based cytology and had a histopathological diagnosis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing malignant PCLs were 0.62 (95% CI, 0.42–0.78) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91–0.98), respectively. The positive and negative LRs for diagnosing malignant PCLs were 16.3 (95% CI, 7.2–37.0) and 0.40 (95% CI, 0.25–0.64), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91–0.95). Conclusions: EUS-FNA-based cytology has overall high specificity, medium sensitivity and good diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant from benign PCLs. Further research is needed to improve the overall sensitivity of EUS-FNA-based cytology for the diagnosis of malignant PCLs.

Suggested Citation

  • Cong Ding & Jian-feng Yang & Xia Wang & Yi-feng Zhou & Ye Gu & Qiang Liu & Hong-zhang Shen & Xiao-feng Zhang, 2025. "Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration-based cytology for distinguishing malignant and benign pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314825
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314825
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314825&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0314825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.