Author
Listed:
- Gilmar F Santos
- Eike Jakubowitz
- Christof Hurschler
Abstract
Prosthetic gait differs considerably from the unimpaired gait. Studying alterations in the gait patterns could help to understand different adaptation mechanisms adopted by these populations. This study investigated the effects of induced stiff-knee gait (SKG) on prosthetic and healthy gait patterns and the capabilities of predictive simulation. Self-selected speed gait of two participants was measured: one healthy subject and one knee disarticulation subject using a variable-damping microprocessor controlled knee prosthesis. Both performed unperturbed gait and gait with restricted knee flexion. Experimental joint angles and moments were computed using OpenSim and muscle activity was measured using surface electromyography (EMG). The differences between the conditions were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Predictive models based on optimal control were created to represent the participants. Additionally, a hypothetical unimpaired predictive model with the same anthropometric characteristics as the amputee was created. Some patterns observed in the experimental prosthetic gait were predicted by the models, including increased knee flexion moment on the contralateral side caused by SKG in both participants, which was statistically significant according to SPM. With the exception of the rectus femoris muscle, we also found overall good agreement between measured EMG and predicted muscle activation. We predicted more alterations in activation of the hip flexors than other muscle groups due to the amputation and in the activation of the biceps femoris short head, quadratus femoris, and tibialis anterior due to SKG. In summary, we demonstrated that the method applied in this study could predict gait alterations due to amputation of the lower limb or due to imposed SKG.
Suggested Citation
Gilmar F Santos & Eike Jakubowitz & Christof Hurschler, 2025.
"Predicting prosthetic gait and the effects of induced stiff-knee gait,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0314758
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314758
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.