IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0314612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resolution of the High versus Low debate for Old and Middle Kingdom Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Pınar Erdil
  • Lyndelle Webster
  • Margot Kuitems
  • Christian Knoblauch
  • Laurel Bestock
  • Felix Höflmayer
  • Hans Beeckman
  • Dorian Q Fuller
  • Sturt W Manning
  • Michael W Dee

Abstract

The unrivaled millennia-long historical chronology of ancient Egypt forms the backbone for archaeological synchronization across the entire Eastern Mediterranean region c. 3000-1000 BCE. However, for more than a century, scholars have wrangled over the correct calendrical positioning of this record, with older scenarios being referred to as ‘High’, and younger ones, ‘Low’ chronologies. Offsets between the two can be as great as a century, substantially confusing connections with other civilizations of the time. Here, we settle this debate for two major periods of political unity in ancient Egypt, the Old Kingdom (the Pyramid Age), and the Middle Kingdom. We introduce 48 high-precision radiocarbon dates obtained through rare access to museum collections as well as freshly excavated samples. By combining these new results with legacy radiocarbon data and with text records for reign lengths of kings within a Bayesian statistical framework, we show that the Low Chronology is no longer empirically supported for the Old and Middle Kingdoms, and resolve a long-standing historical schism.

Suggested Citation

  • Pınar Erdil & Lyndelle Webster & Margot Kuitems & Christian Knoblauch & Laurel Bestock & Felix Höflmayer & Hans Beeckman & Dorian Q Fuller & Sturt W Manning & Michael W Dee, 2025. "Resolution of the High versus Low debate for Old and Middle Kingdom Egypt," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314612
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314612
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314612&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0314612?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.