IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0314450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An interpretable framework for inter-observer agreement measurements in TILs scoring on histopathological breast images: A proof-of-principle study

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulkerim Capar
  • Dursun Ali Ekinci
  • Mucahit Ertano
  • M Khalid Khan Niazi
  • Erva Bengu Balaban
  • Ibrahim Aloglu
  • Meryem Dogan
  • Ziyu Su
  • Fugen Vardar Aker
  • Metin Nafi Gurcan

Abstract

Breast cancer, a widespread and life-threatening disease, necessitates precise diagnostic tools for improved patient outcomes. Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs), reflective of the immune response against cancer cells, are pivotal in understanding breast cancer behavior. However, inter-observer variability in TILs scoring methods poses challenges to reliable assessments. This study introduces a novel and interpretable proof-of-principle framework comprising two innovative inter-observer agreement measures. The first method, Boundary-Weighted Fleiss’ Kappa (BWFK), addresses tissue segmentation predictions, focusing on mitigating disagreements along tissue boundaries. BWFK enhances the accuracy of stromal segmentation, providing a nuanced assessment of inter-observer agreement. The second proposed method, the Distance Based Cell Agreement Algorithm (DBCAA), eliminates the need for ground truth annotations in cell detection predictions. This innovative approach offers versatility across histopathological analyses, overcoming data availability challenges. Both methods were applied to assess inter-observer agreement using a clinical image dataset consisting of 25 images of invasive ductal breast carcinoma tissue, each annotated by four pathologists, serving as a proof-of-principle. Experimental investigations demonstrated that the BWFK method yielded gains of up to 32% compared to the standard Fleiss’ Kappa model. Furthermore, a procedure for conducting clinical validations of artificial intelligence (AI) based cell detection methods was elucidated. Thoroughly validated on a clinical dataset, the framework contributes to standardized, reliable, and interpretable inter-observer agreement assessments. This study is the first examination of inter-observer agreements in stromal segmentation and lymphocyte detection for the TILs scoring problem. The study emphasizes the potential impact of these measures in advancing histopathological image analysis, fostering consensus in TILs scoring, and ultimately improving breast cancer diagnostics and treatment planning. The source code and implementation guide for this study are accessible on our GitHub page, and the full clinical dataset is available for academic and research purposes on Kaggle.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulkerim Capar & Dursun Ali Ekinci & Mucahit Ertano & M Khalid Khan Niazi & Erva Bengu Balaban & Ibrahim Aloglu & Meryem Dogan & Ziyu Su & Fugen Vardar Aker & Metin Nafi Gurcan, 2024. "An interpretable framework for inter-observer agreement measurements in TILs scoring on histopathological breast images: A proof-of-principle study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314450
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314450
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314450&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0314450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.