IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0314430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The reproducibility of protocols used to mediate a current-induced vasodilation in the human cutaneous microcirculation

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia Guigui
  • Léa Liaigre
  • Matthieu Roustit
  • Jordan Loader

Abstract

Introduction: Current-induced vasodilation (CIV) can be used to assess the prostacyclin (PGI2) pathway. This study, for the first time, evaluated the reproducibility of several protocols used to mediate a CIV. Methods: Three CIV protocols were evaluated in 10 healthy participants who completed four testing sessions. Two testing sessions were conducted on the calf, separated by a period of seven days allowing interday reproducibility to be assessed. Two testing sessions were also conducted seven days apart on the forearm. At each testing session, cutaneous microvascular assessments were conducted for one hour on the right limb of interest before assessments were immediately performed on the left limb, allowing for intersite, intraday reproducibility to be evaluated. Assessments were then repeated at the same site on the right limb, allowing for intrasite, intraday reproducibility to be evaluated. Reproducibility was assessed using the within-subject coefficients of variation and the intra-class correlation coefficients. Results: Protocol A (Pulses of 0.03, 0.06, 0.09, 0.12, 0.15, and 0.18 mA for 10 s each; 60 s intervals), Protocol B (0.1 mA for 60 s), and Protocol C (2 pulses of 0.1 mA for 10s each; 240 s interval) had good to excellent interday reproducibility for calf and forearm assessments. The intrasite, intraday reproducibility of each protocol was less clear. Intersite testing didn’t improve intraday reproducibility. Reproducibility was consistently unacceptable when the microvascular response to the electrical stimulation was expressed as the absolute change and the percentage change between baseline values and the maximal plateau. A microvascular response wasn’t induced ∼10% of assessments on either the calf or forearm. Conclusions: This study indicates that a CIV is most reproducible with interday testing and when data are expressed as the maximal plateau in perfusion units or as cutaneous vascular conductance, and as the area under the curve.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia Guigui & Léa Liaigre & Matthieu Roustit & Jordan Loader, 2024. "The reproducibility of protocols used to mediate a current-induced vasodilation in the human cutaneous microcirculation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314430
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314430
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314430&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0314430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.